Posted: 27 Dec 2017 Michael Snyder THE ECONOMIC COLLAPSE BLOG
Demonization is the first step toward making something illegal. Over the past couple of months, Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have experienced a tremendous surge in popularity. Personally, I was completely floored the other day when my nephew wanted to ask me questions about investing in Bitcoin. It seems like the whole world is getting caught up in the cryptocurrency revolution, and needless to say, the powers that be cannot be thrilled about this. Independently-controlled cryptocurrencies represent an existential threat to the global debt-based central banking system that we have today, and so the elite have a very strong incentive to bring about the demise of Bitcoin and other emerging cryptocurrencies. So it is no surprise that one of the key mouthpieces for the elite, the Washington Post, has begun to demonize Bitcoin. And if you are going to demonize something, one of the fastest ways to do that is to link it with racists. The following is an excerpt from an article that the Post just published entitled “Bitcoin’s Boom Is A Boon For Extremist Groups”… Even before Charlottesville, Richard Spencer, a prominent member of the alt-right, a group that espouses racist, anti-Semitic and sexist views and seeks a whites-only state, had gone as far as declaring bitcoin “the currency of the alt right.” But far-right political leaders and experts on extremist movements alike say the adoption of bitcoin gained new urgency after Charlottesville as extremists looked for ways to operate beyond the reach of government control and the shifting policies of U.S. tech companies.For those of us that are accustomed to thinking critically, we see right through what the Washington Post is trying to do. The Bitcoin phenomenon has absolutely nothing to do with Richard Spencer and his ilk, but every time the liberal elite want to demonize someone or something they trot out their favorite boogeyman once again. Just like every other currency, Bitcoin can be used for good purposes or for bad purposes. But the Washington Post article would have us believe that Bitcoin is at the core of some great “racist conspiracy” that is about to take America by storm… Extremist figures who invested in bitcoin as a bulwark against efforts to block their political activity now find themselves holding what amount to winning lottery tickets. The proceeds could be used to communicate political messages, organize events and keep websites online even as most mainstream hosting services shun them, experts say.The truth, of course, is that these sorts of racists are a very, very small fraction of one percent of the U.S. population. They are so small in numbers that they are not even worth mentioning, but the Washington Post and other liberal outlets love to give them attention because they make the perfect enemies for the narratives that they are trying to promote. Later on in the article, there was an effort to link Bitcoin to drug traffickers, money launderers and those who use the Internet for other dark purposes… Extremists are hardly alone in benefiting from surging bitcoin values. Early buyers include cryptography enthusiasts, libertarians and professional investors – as well as drug traffickers, money launderers and others who regularly conduct transactions on the “dark Web,” a part of the Internet only accessible using specialized software that helps shield online activity.The “logical conclusion” that many on the left are going to come to after reading such an article is that Bitcoin must be banned. In the months and years ahead, I would expect to see a major push to crack down on cryptocurrencies. And once independent cryptocurrencies have been dealt with, the elite will promote their own versions as the long-term solution. According to the Post article, the Southern Poverty Law Center is currently tracking 200 Bitcoin wallets that they believe are owned by extremists. Apparently, every single transaction that involves these accounts is being monitored… Public blockchain records make such monitoring possible. Researchers can study the times, dates and amounts of any transaction, along with what accounts are involved. That does not include the actual names of account holders, but such records can illuminate identities. The SPLC, for example, looks on the donation pages of extremist websites for bitcoin accounts that are seeking contributions.If the elite are ultimately able to convince the general public that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are for racists, criminals, tax evaders and drug dealers, that will make it much easier to crack down on them. But of course blockchain technology is here to stay. Once the elite are able to move the public away from “unregulated cryptocurrencies”, they will simply introduce “Fedcoin”, “Utility Settlement Coin” or whichever other digital currency that they want to promote at the time. For the moment, however, the cryptocurrency revolution is still raging. Even as I write this article, the price of Bitcoin is flying all over the place. At the moment it is sitting at $14,730, but that will change in a few moments. I would anticipate even more volatility as we head into 2018, and other experts seem to be of the same opinion. For example, just consider what Nick Colas is saying… Nick Colas, co-founder of DataTrek Research, has been following the bitcoin phenomenon for at least four years. Looking ahead to 2018, he sees more volatility for an asset that has soared nearly 1,600 percent over the past year.But as I have said before, the key to this phenomenon is not how high the price of Bitcoin can climb. Rather, the key is if Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies can truly become methods of exchange that are widely used outside of the control of national governments and global central banks. If we can create a truly autonomous financial system that is independent of the current debt-based system, that would be a wonderful thing for humanity. Unfortunately, the elite are going to fight very hard to keep that from happening, because control over currencies is one of the main factors that allows them to have so much control over the entire planet. Michael Snyder is a Republican candidate for Congress in Idaho’s First Congressional District, and you can learn how you can get involved in the campaign on his official website. His new book entitled “Living A Life That Really Matters” is available in paperback and for the Kindle on Amazon.com. |
Thousands of abortion opponents gathered in cold, blustery weather near the Washington Monument Friday and heard Vice President Mike Pence tell the annual March for Life that the Trump administration is determined to advance the fight against abortion.
The massive crowd, bearing flags, banners and placards, then flowed down Constitution Avenue, filling the street, and rallied at the Supreme Court building across from the Capitol.
“We will not grow weary,” Pence said in a ten-minute addresss to the throng at the monument. “We will not rest, until we restore a culture of life in America for ourselves and our posterity,” He said the administration is bent on ending tax-payer funding of abortion and abortion providers. And he said that “next week President Donald Trump will announce a Supreme Court nominee who will uphold the God-given liberty enshrined in our Constitution in the tradition of the late and great Justice Antonin Scalia.”
Scalia, a conservative associate justice of the Supreme Court, died last year.
“Life is winning again in America,” said Pence, who added that Trump asked him to speak at the rally. “That is evident in...the historic election of a president...who I proudly say stands for the right to life.”
Pence was the first U.S. vice president to address the march in its history.
Bundled against a stiff wind, marchers from around the country first descended on the northeast grounds of the monument.
Pence, who has called himself an “evangelical Catholic,” has long been a hero among antiabortion activists and as governor of Indiana signed what was considered some of the strictest laws on abortion.
Also addressing the crowd was key Trump advisor Kellyanne Conway.
“I am a wife, a mother, a Catholic, counselor to the president of the United States of America and, yes, I am pro-life,” she said.
Vice President Pence said President Trump asked him to attend the March for Life and told the crowd that the administration will push forward policies they seek, including defunding Planned Parenthood. (The Washington Post)
“This is a new day, a new dawn, for life,” she said.
The right to life “is not a privilege,” she said. “Its is not a choice. It is God-given...This is a time of incredible promise for the pro-life, pro-adoption movement.”
“We hear you,” she told the crowd, which earlier had been chanting, “Kell-ee-anne! Kell-ee-anne!”
“We see you,” she said. “We respect you. And we look forward to working with you.”
This year, organizers hoped to see a surge of energy with the ascension of a president who is expected to move forward on antiabortion policies, including defunding Planned Parenthood and appointing an antiabortion Supreme Court justice.
“He’s pro-life,” Lynn Ray, coordinator of campus ministry at the Louisiana State University at Alexandria, said Friday as she stood on Constitution Avenue with a group from the university. “So that’s good for us.”
“Being that we’re Catholics, we’re very pro-life,” she said. “Every step we take, we take for an unborn baby,” she said. “We’re not persecuting anyone, of course, just marching for the babies.”
Madeline Runyan, 22, a senior at LSU, said she, too, was pleased with President Trump’s stance on abortion. “I’m very confident in what he’s doing to help this cause,” she said. “I’m really excited and optimistic.”
The rally began at around 11:45 a.m. Pence spoke shortly after noon. The march began at around 1 p.m., and the crowd moved east, past the Capitol, and toward the Supreme Court, where another large assembly had already gathered.
There were members of the clergy, as well as “Bikers for Life.”
Many marchers were in school and church groups, carrying flags, banners, posters — and a life-size cutout of Pope Francis. They sang, chanted and prayed. The vast majority was white.
Dan Kehoe didn’t see the march as a political statement, but a religious one.
The 34-year-old from Taos, Mo., was a chaperone on his daughter’s eighth-grade Catholic Church trip. They took a Greyhound bus for 22 hours for what they called a “pilgrimage” to Washington.
He saw news coverage of last week’s Women’s March on Washington and thought that was a political march about women’s issues. This, he said, is “completely different,” and is not about women’s rights, but human ones.
“It’s not just a woman’s choice, it takes two to make a child,” he said.
More than 200 people made the trip from his central Missouri church community with him, most of them children. He said he voted for Donald Trump, and is happy with his presidents performance so far.
“If the younger generation doesn’t speak up now, who will?”
Large groups are common at the march, characterized by matching hats or shirts.
One block-long mass of 200 teenagers from 15 churches and three Catholic high schools filled five charter buses, but was only part of a 500-strong group from the Archdiocese of Mobile, Ala.
“Remember, we are guests in this city and we’re going to be respectful,” called Adam Ganucheau, 30, has he and other youth leaders handed out 200 boxes Subway sandwiches. “We are pilgrims; we do not litter.”
The size of the group is typical, said Ganucheau, who has attended more than a dozen of these marches since 2001. But he senses an extra electricity.
“It’s historic that these kids will be able to say they heard and saw the vice president,” he said as the throng began to move, sandwiches in hand.
Ganucheau said he was glad to have an antiabortion administration take office, although there are parts of the Trump agenda that concern him.
In addition to opposing abortion, Ganucheau said his faith also led him to support equal wages, equal pay, a welcoming immigration posture and other progressive social causes.
“Being Catholic is more than being conservative or liberal,” he said. “We believe in treating all people with respect.”
Earlier, Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life, listed her four demands for Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress:
● Appoint an antiabortion justice to the Supreme Court.
● Make the Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funding for many abortions in the United States, into a permanent law rather than the one-year provision that has been extended each year from 1976 to the present.
● Pass a law banning abortion nationwide after 20 weeks of pregnancy.
● Stop all federal funding for Planned Parenthood unless the organization were to somehow stop performing abortions.
The gathering came a week after Trump’s inauguration and followed last Saturday’s vast Women’s March on Washington.
Asked about the Women’s March, Ray, of Deville, La., said:
“I’m all about women’s rights, except when it comes to the baby. I believe — it’s my opinion — but I believe a baby is a gift from God, and once the baby is a gift from God, it’s no longer your body, but there’s another body within. And that body has a right also.”
When march attendee Brianna Roberts, 21, of Reading, Pa., met her birthmother two years ago, she was upset to hear that relatives wanted the woman to abort her.
Her mother was 20, already had one child, and was getting by on food stamps, Roberts said. But when her mother went to a clinic seeking an abortion, she was told she was too far along for the clinic to perform one.
Her birthmother placed Roberts for adoption. “She did the right and responsible thing,” Roberts said.
Roberts said she did not vote because she didn’t like either Trump or Clinton, but she is optimistic that Trump will advance anti-abortion policies.
“I thought this was going to be a really big year for policy change,” she said.
Francis Leung, 18, a college student from Naples, Fla., said he has attended the March for Life with his parents almost every year since “I was a little kid” in a stroller.
Now, at 18, six feet tall and a college freshman, he stood in the throng of demonstrators and grinned, saying, “I always look forward to it.”
Leung said he grew up in a devoutly Catholic family and has been hearing a strong anti-abortion message from his parents for as long as he can remember. His nine siblings -- eight of whom came to Washington with him this week -- have heard it, too.
“It’s a great movement, because it’s simple,” said Leung, a student at Ave Maria University in Florida. He was referring to the annual the March for Life. It’s simple, he said, because “every unborn child has a right to life.”
Like his brothers and sisters, Leung said, he was home-schooled. And a central theme of his education was this: “When two humans come together and produce a child, when they create a baby, that’s like, really, really big -- it’s the most important thing in the world. Procreation. It’s what human beings were put on Earth to do.”
The first March for Life was held one year after the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 that recognized a right to abortion nationwide. Subsequent marches have been held on or near the Jan. 22 anniversary every year since.
On Friday, the marchers chanted, “Hey, hey, ho ho, Roe v Wade has got to go!”
Nationwide, 59 percent of Americans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, the highest percentage since 1996, according to a 2016 Pew Research Center .
Michael E. Ruane, Perry Stein, Steve Hendrix, Terrence McCoy, Paul Duggan, Tara Bahrampour, Joe Heim and Michael Chandler contributed to this report.
